Flux Edit Kontext vs WAN 2.7 Image Edit
Generated on PixelDojo. Produced by PixelDojo's generation pipeline.
Flux Edit Kontext and WAN 2.7 Image Edit both cost 1 credit per image at their base tier. Given the same reference photo of a woman and the same instruction to place her on a bicycle in a rainy city crosswalk, WAN 2.7 Image Edit returned a 2048x2048 file in about 21 seconds. Flux Edit Kontext's dev tier returned a 1024x1024 file in about 8 minutes, and cropped in tighter than the wide shot the prompt asked for. Same price, same instruction, different results.
The same reference photo and scene instruction on both
Every example below was produced on PixelDojo. Hover to see the prompt.
Place this exact woman on a bicycle crossing a rainy city crosswalk at dusk, neon shop signs reflecting in puddles, cinematic wide shot, keep her face, glasses, red curly hair, denim jacket and yellow shirt identical
Flux Edit Kontext (dev)
Place this exact woman on a bicycle crossing a rainy city crosswalk at dusk, neon shop signs reflecting in puddles, cinematic wide shot, keep her face, glasses, red curly hair, denim jacket and yellow shirt identical
WAN 2.7 Image Edit
Same reference photo, same scene instruction, same 1 credit price. WAN 2.7 Image Edit: 2048x2048 in about 21 seconds. Flux Edit Kontext: 1024x1024 in about 8 minutes.
Why Choose Pixel Dojo for Flux Edit Kontext vs WAN 2.7 Image Edit
Professional-quality results with cutting-edge AI technology
Both kept the character's identity
Face, glasses, red curly hair, denim jacket and yellow shirt all carried over correctly on both outputs, confirmed by downloading and viewing each file.
WAN 2.7 Image Edit followed the framing instruction
The prompt asked for a cinematic wide shot. WAN 2.7 Image Edit delivered the full bicycle and a wide street with visible rain. Flux Edit Kontext's dev tier cropped to a waist up portrait instead.
WAN 2.7 Image Edit was far faster on this run
About 21 seconds against about 8 minutes for Flux Edit Kontext's dev tier, at the identical 1 credit price.
How It Works
How we ran the comparison, so you can repeat it:
Start from one reference photo
The same saved character photo went to both tools, at Flux Edit Kontext's default dev tier and WAN 2.7 Image Edit's default Standard tier.
Send the identical scene instruction
Both got the same request: place her on a bicycle in a rainy city crosswalk at dusk, keep the face, glasses, hair and outfit identical, and frame it as a wide shot.
Download both files and measure them
We opened each output, read the real pixel dimensions, and compared how closely each one followed the wide shot instruction instead of trusting a label.
The Pixel Dojo Advantage
Same reference photo, same instruction, same 1 credit price at the base tier. We downloaded both files and measured them directly rather than trusting either provider's resolution label.
| Others | Pixel Dojo |
|---|---|
| Flux Edit Kontext (dev): 1 credit, about 8 minutes (479 seconds) on our run, measured 1024x1024 | WAN 2.7 Image Edit (Standard): 1 credit, about 21 seconds on the identical prompt and photo, measured 2048x2048 |
| Flux Edit Kontext dev: single reference image only; pro and max add a second reference for 1 and 2 credits | WAN 2.7 Image Edit: up to 9 reference images in one request at the same 1 credit Standard price |
| Flux Edit Kontext dev: cropped to a waist up portrait, shifted the sky to full night, only two neon signs visible | WAN 2.7 Image Edit: delivered the full wide shot the prompt asked for, with visible rain streaks and more neon signage in frame |
| Flux Edit Kontext: has its own tool page in the dashboard with a dev, pro and max variant picker | WAN 2.7 Image Edit: API and Canvas only, no dedicated tool page, reached as the edit action inside WAN 2.7 |
Loved by creators on PixelDojo
Real feedback from people using PixelDojo, pulled from our in-product surveys.
I have already recommended it to friends
All the tools, plus the guidance
Excellent tools. Ease of use. Well thought out interface. Wide variety of AI tools and features which are up to date with more added each month
I really like how the site is kept up to date, and the leaderboard (where I'm currently #11 most popular artist)
This is the best image generator I've used so far. Well done!
es facil de comprender asi uno no sea programador
Explore more AI tools on PixelDojo
AI Tools
Compare & Switch
- Best AI Image Generators
- Best AI Video Generators
- Midjourney Alternatives
- Civitai Alternatives
- Runway Alternatives
- Leonardo Alternatives
- Pika Alternatives
- Luma Alternatives
- Magnific Alternatives
- Veo Alternatives
- Flux Alternatives
- Freepik Alternatives
- Seedance Alternatives
- Seedream Alternatives
- Pixverse Alternatives
- GPT Image Alternatives
- Synthesia Alternatives
- Playground Alternatives
- NightCafe Alternatives
- Canva AI Alternatives
- ElevenLabs Alternatives
- ComfyUI Alternatives
- Fal Alternatives
- Replicate Alternatives
Common Questions
Everything you need to know about Flux Edit Kontext vs WAN 2.7 Image Edit
Which is cheaper, Flux Edit Kontext or WAN 2.7 Image Edit?
They tie at their base tier, 1 credit per image each. Flux Edit Kontext's pro variant also costs 1 credit; only its max variant costs more, at 2 credits. WAN 2.7 Image Edit's Pro tier costs 2 credits.
Which one is faster?
WAN 2.7 Image Edit, by a wide margin in our test: about 21 seconds against about 8 minutes for Flux Edit Kontext's dev tier, on the identical reference photo and instruction.
Which one followed the wide shot instruction better?
WAN 2.7 Image Edit. Our prompt asked for a cinematic wide shot, and WAN 2.7 Image Edit delivered the full bicycle in a wide street scene with visible rain. Flux Edit Kontext's dev tier cropped in to a waist up portrait instead and rendered the sky as full night rather than dusk.
How many reference images can each one take?
Flux Edit Kontext's dev tier accepts one reference image; pro and max accept a second. WAN 2.7 Image Edit accepts up to 9 reference images per request at its base 1 credit price, useful for fusing more source photos into one edit.
What resolution does each one output?
On our identical prompt and photo, Flux Edit Kontext's dev tier measured 1024x1024 and WAN 2.7 Image Edit measured 2048x2048, four times the pixel count at the same 1 credit price.
How do I call either from the API?
POST to /api/v1/models/flux-edit/run with prompt, input_image_1, and model set to dev, pro or max. POST to /api/v1/models/wan-2.7-image-edit/run with prompt and an image_urls array, leaving model unset for the 1 credit Standard tier.
So which one should I use?
Pick WAN 2.7 Image Edit when speed matters, when you are fusing more than two reference images, or when you need the higher 2048x2048 output at the base price. Pick Flux Edit Kontext when you want a dedicated tool page in the dashboard with a dev, pro and max picker, or when you plan to step up to the max tier's second reference slot for a heavier quality pass. On this run WAN 2.7 Image Edit also followed the wide shot framing more literally.