Kling Motion Control Pro vs WAN 2.2 Animate
Generated on PixelDojo. Produced by PixelDojo's generation pipeline.
Kling Motion Control Pro costs 4 credits per second and WAN 2.2 Animate costs 2, so a 5 second clip runs 20 credits on Kling Pro against 10 on WAN. We drove the same character photo with the same reference video on both models on August 26, 2026. Kling Pro's extra cost bought a sharper, higher-resolution clip with the reference video's own audio kept intact; WAN's clip rendered smaller and silent, but finished in about the same neighborhood of time despite the lower price. Here is what each credit bought.
Same character photo, a video driving the motion
Every example below was produced on PixelDojo. Hover to see the prompt.
Animate this character with the reference video's motion
Kling Motion Control v3 Pro
Animate this character with the reference video's motion
WAN 2.2 Animate
Double the price, what changed
What we sent both models
The same character photo of a fisherman, and the same reference video showing a person's upper body in motion, at a 5 second duration.
What Kling Motion Control Pro returned
20 credits, about 242 seconds, a 1248 by 1664 pixel clip carrying the reference video's own audio track, since keep_original_sound defaults to true.
What WAN 2.2 Animate returned
10 credits, about 437 seconds on our earlier run with this same reference setup, a 544 by 720 pixel clip with no audio track in that test.
The resolution gap is the headline difference
1248x1664 against 544x720 is a real jump in pixel count, not a marketing number. If the output is going anywhere near full screen, that gap will show.
Why Choose Pixel Dojo for Kling Motion Control Pro vs WAN 2.2 Animate
Professional-quality results with cutting-edge AI technology
WAN 2.2 Animate is half the per-second price
2 credits per second against Kling Motion Control Pro's 4. A 5 second clip is 10 credits on WAN, 20 on Kling Pro.
Kling Motion Control Pro renders at a much higher resolution
1248 by 1664 in our test against WAN's 544 by 720, more than five times the pixel count.
Kling Motion Control Pro keeps the reference clip's audio
keep_original_sound is on by default, so the output carries whatever sound was in your source video. WAN's output in our test did not.
How It Works
How we ran the comparison, so you can repeat it:
Use a reference video with a visible upper body
Kling Motion Control's upper-body check applies to both its Standard and Pro tiers, so the reference clip needs a person's torso in frame before either will render.
Pin the Pro tier and match the duration
Passing the kling-motion-control-pro apiId locks in the 4 credit per second rate. We ran it at the same 5 second duration as our WAN 2.2 Animate comparison.
Compare resolution and audio, not just price
Kling Pro's 20 credits returned a 1248 by 1664 clip with audio kept; WAN's 10 credits returned a smaller, silent 544 by 720 clip.
The Pixel Dojo Advantage
Same character photo, a reference video driving the motion, run through both models on the same day.
| Others | Pixel Dojo |
|---|---|
| Kling Motion Control Pro: 4 credits per second, 20 credits for a 5 second clip, about 242 seconds to render | WAN 2.2 Animate: 2 credits per second, 10 credits for a 5 second clip, about 437 seconds to render |
| Kling Motion Control Pro output: 1248 by 1664 pixels | WAN 2.2 Animate output: 544 by 720 pixels |
| Kling Motion Control Pro output: carried the reference clip's audio track | WAN 2.2 Animate output: no audio track in our test |
| Kling Motion Control Pro: requires a reference video with a complete upper body visible | WAN 2.2 Animate: no equivalent visibility check on the reference video |
Loved by creators on PixelDojo
Real feedback from people using PixelDojo, pulled from our in-product surveys.
Very eay to use, works well to train SDXL loras.
The amazing tools
Top notch quality and strong prompt adherence.
A well resourced sunscription with attention to updates.
Easy to use and there's lots of options.
super lora download
Explore more AI tools on PixelDojo
AI Tools
Compare & Switch
- Best AI Image Generators
- Best AI Video Generators
- Midjourney Alternatives
- Civitai Alternatives
- Runway Alternatives
- Leonardo Alternatives
- Pika Alternatives
- Luma Alternatives
- Magnific Alternatives
- Veo Alternatives
- Flux Alternatives
- Freepik Alternatives
- Seedance Alternatives
- Seedream Alternatives
- Pixverse Alternatives
- GPT Image Alternatives
- Synthesia Alternatives
- Playground Alternatives
- NightCafe Alternatives
- Canva AI Alternatives
- ElevenLabs Alternatives
- ComfyUI Alternatives
- Fal Alternatives
- Replicate Alternatives
Common Questions
Everything you need to know about Kling Motion Control Pro vs WAN 2.2 Animate
Which is cheaper, Kling Motion Control Pro or WAN 2.2 Animate?
WAN 2.2 Animate, at half the per-second rate. It bills 2 credits per second against Kling Motion Control Pro's 4, so a 5 second clip costs 10 credits on WAN and 20 on Kling Pro.
What does the extra cost on Kling Motion Control Pro buy?
Resolution and audio, based on our test. Kling Pro returned a 1248 by 1664 pixel clip with the reference video's audio kept; WAN 2.2 Animate returned a smaller 544 by 720 pixel clip with no audio track.
Which one is faster?
Kling Motion Control Pro, in our test: about 242 seconds against about 437 seconds for WAN 2.2 Animate on a comparable 5 second clip.
Does the reference video need to show a full body?
It needs to show a complete upper body for Kling Motion Control (both Standard and Pro share the same underlying check). A tight hands-only or product-only crop gets rejected before rendering starts. WAN 2.2 Animate has no equivalent requirement in its schema.
What is the longest clip Kling Motion Control Pro can produce?
Up to 30 seconds when character_orientation is set to 'video', or 10 seconds for 'image', the same limits as the Standard tier since both run on the same underlying model.
How do I call them from the API?
POST to /api/v1/models/kling-motion-control-pro/run or /api/v1/models/wan-2.2-animate/run with a video URL, a character_image URL, and a duration.