Seedance 1.5 vs WAN 2.2 Standard
Generated on PixelDojo. Produced by PixelDojo's generation pipeline.
Use WAN 2.2 Standard when the budget matters most. Use Seedance 1.5 when you want native audio in the file and don't mind paying twice as much. We sent the same earbuds product photo and orbit prompt to both on August 26, 2026: Seedance 1.5 at its cheapest setting cost 6 credits and took about 200 seconds, while WAN 2.2 Standard cost 3 credits and took about 170 seconds. This page lays out what each run actually measured, including a duration mismatch worth knowing about before you rely on WAN 2.2's timing field.
Both clips, same photo and prompt, first result kept
Every example below was produced on PixelDojo. Hover to see the prompt.
Slow cinematic camera orbit around the earbuds case, soft studio lighting shifts, the lid opens gently to reveal the earbuds, product commercial style
Seedance 1.5
Slow cinematic camera orbit around the earbuds case, soft studio lighting shifts, the lid opens gently to reveal the earbuds, product commercial style
WAN 2.2 Standard
What the two runs actually measured
Both took the same starting photo
We gave both models the exact same earbuds product still and the same camera orbit prompt, so price, speed, and output behavior are the only variables left.
Seedance 1.5's cheapest test: 6 credits, about 200 seconds
Image-to-video mode, 4 second duration, 480p. The finished file measured 640 by 640 pixels at 24 frames a second, 4.04 seconds long, about 1.09 MB, with an audio track in the container. Seedance 1.5 bills 1.5 credits a second, rounded up, so 4 seconds is 6 credits.
WAN 2.2 Standard's test: 3 credits, about 170 seconds
Image-to-video mode, 480p, 5 second duration requested. The finished file measured 624 by 624 pixels at 30 frames a second and ran 6.30 seconds, about 30 percent longer than we asked for. WAN 2.2 Standard is a flat 3 credits at 480p regardless of the duration field.
WAN 2.2 Standard's duration field is a request, not a guarantee
We set duration to 5 seconds and the file that came back measured 6.30 seconds. The price did not change either way, since Standard tier billing is flat by resolution, not by requested duration. Budget for the output length you actually get, not the number you type in.
Audio is a real difference here, not just a setting
Seedance 1.5 is documented with native audio and our file carried an audio track. WAN 2.2 Standard's file had no audio track at all in this run.
Same photo, same prompt, same day, two different models. Seedance 1.5: 6 credits, about 200 seconds, 640x640, 4.04s, with audio. WAN 2.2 Standard: 3 credits, about 170 seconds, 624x624, 6.30s, no audio.
Why Choose Pixel Dojo for Seedance 1.5 vs WAN 2.2 Standard
Professional-quality results with cutting-edge AI technology
Pick WAN 2.2 Standard for the lower price
3 credits flat at 480p, half of Seedance 1.5's cheapest test, with no separate charge tied to the duration field.
Pick Seedance 1.5 when the file needs audio
Our export carried an audio track without a separate step. WAN 2.2 Standard's file had none.
Both animate a real reference photo
The exact earbuds case we photographed drove both clips, rather than a model guessing the product from a text description.
How It Works
How we ran the comparison, so you can repeat it:
Send the same photo and prompt to both models
The earbuds orbit prompt went to Seedance 1.5 and WAN 2.2 Standard in image-to-video mode, both pointed at the exact same product still.
Use each model's cheapest viable setting
Seedance 1.5 at its 4 second floor and 480p, WAN 2.2 Standard at 480p with a 5 second duration request.
Time both from the app or the API, then check the output
Generate from either tool page, or POST to /api/v1/models/seedance-1.5/run or /api/v1/models/wan-2.2-standard/run. Ours charged 6 and 3 credits, returned in about 200 and 170 seconds, and WAN 2.2's clip ran longer than requested.
The Pixel Dojo Advantage
Real numbers from the same day, same photo, same prompt, two different models.
| Others | Pixel Dojo |
|---|---|
| Seedance 1.5: 1.5 credits a second, rounded up. Our cheapest test, 4 seconds at 480p, cost 6 credits. | WAN 2.2 Standard: a flat 3 credits at 480p, 4 at 720p, regardless of duration. Our test cost 3 credits. |
| Seedance 1.5 measured turnaround: about 200 seconds for a 4.04 second clip. | WAN 2.2 Standard measured turnaround: about 170 seconds for a clip that came back 6.30 seconds long. |
| Seedance 1.5 output: 640x640, 24fps, 4.04 seconds, about 1.09 MB, matching the requested duration. | WAN 2.2 Standard output: 624x624, 30fps, 6.30 seconds, longer than the 5 seconds we requested. |
| Seedance 1.5 duration range: 4 to 12 seconds, resolution 480p or 720p. | WAN 2.2 Standard resolution range: 480p, 720p, or 1080p, but the duration field did not match our output length in this run. |
| Seedance 1.5 audio: documented native audio; our file carried a track. | WAN 2.2 Standard audio: no audio track in the file we generated. |
Loved by creators on PixelDojo
Real feedback from people using PixelDojo, pulled from our in-product surveys.
The Flux Pro Ultra is just amazing!
Very easy to use, and they have fast wan 2.2 video generation with custom loras available.
The overall quality of the site and it's amazing variety of tools. The continued updates of the UI. The unbelievable level of tech support.
THIS IS SO DOPE !
I have already recommended it to friends
All the tools, plus the guidance
Explore more AI tools on PixelDojo
AI Tools
Compare & Switch
- Best AI Image Generators
- Best AI Video Generators
- Midjourney Alternatives
- Civitai Alternatives
- Runway Alternatives
- Leonardo Alternatives
- Pika Alternatives
- Luma Alternatives
- Magnific Alternatives
- Veo Alternatives
- Flux Alternatives
- Freepik Alternatives
- Seedance Alternatives
- Seedream Alternatives
- Pixverse Alternatives
- GPT Image Alternatives
- Synthesia Alternatives
- Playground Alternatives
- NightCafe Alternatives
- Canva AI Alternatives
- ElevenLabs Alternatives
- ComfyUI Alternatives
- Fal Alternatives
- Replicate Alternatives
Common Questions
Everything you need to know about Seedance 1.5 vs WAN 2.2 Standard
Which is cheaper, Seedance 1.5 or WAN 2.2 Standard?
WAN 2.2 Standard. Our test cost a flat 3 credits at 480p. Seedance 1.5's cheapest test, a 4 second clip at 480p, cost 6 credits, since it bills 1.5 credits a second.
Which one is faster?
WAN 2.2 Standard in our test, about 170 seconds against about 200 seconds for Seedance 1.5, both measured on August 26, 2026. Turnaround moves with queue load on both, so treat these as typical rather than guaranteed.
Does WAN 2.2 Standard's duration setting do what it says?
Not exactly, in our test. We requested 5 seconds and the file that came back measured 6.30 seconds. The price is flat by resolution on this tier, so the mismatch did not change what we paid, but plan around the actual output length rather than the field.
Which one has audio?
Seedance 1.5. It is documented with native audio and our generated file carried an audio track. WAN 2.2 Standard's file had none.
Which should I use for a quick, cheap draft?
WAN 2.2 Standard, for the lower flat price. Move to Seedance 1.5 once you need the output to carry sound without a separate step.
How do I call each one from the API?
POST to /api/v1/models/seedance-1.5/run for Seedance 1.5, or /api/v1/models/wan-2.2-standard/run for WAN 2.2 Standard. Same API key, same request shape, just a different apiId in the URL.