Skip to main content

Seedance 2 Mini vs WAN 2.1 Video

AI Generated

Generated on PixelDojo. Produced by PixelDojo's generation pipeline.

Cancel anytimeCommercial-use license50+ AI models

WAN 2.1 Video costs less per second than Seedance 2 Mini, 1.5 credits against 1 credit at 480p, but its shortest allowed clip is 1 second while Mini's floor is 5 seconds, so our two test clips came out to 1.5 credits against 5 credits. We sent both models the same earbuds product photo with the same camera-orbit instruction on August 26, 2026. Seedance 2 Mini kept the requested widescreen framing and generates audio by default. WAN 2.1 Video rendered square regardless of the aspect ratio we asked for, and returned no audio track. This page breaks down what each credit actually buys.

Same product photo, same camera-orbit instruction

Every example below was produced on PixelDojo. Hover to see the prompt.

Slow cinematic camera orbit around the earbuds case, soft studio lighting shifts, the lid opens gently to reveal the earbuds, product commercial style

Seedance 2 Mini

Slow cinematic camera orbit around the earbuds case, soft studio lighting shifts, the lid opens gently to reveal the earbuds, product commercial style

WAN 2.1 Video

The same product shot, two different floors

What we sent both models

A studio still of matte black wireless earbuds in an open charging case, plus the instruction: slow cinematic camera orbit around the case, soft studio lighting shifts, the lid opens gently to reveal the earbuds, product commercial style.

Seedance 2 Mini pricing

1 credit per second at 480p, 2 credits per second at 720p. Duration only comes in 5, 10, or 15 second increments, so the cheapest possible run is 5 credits.

WAN 2.1 Video pricing

1.5 credits per second, and that rate does not change between 480p and 720p. Duration is an integer from 1 to 5, so we ran it at 1 second for a 1.5 credit floor, less than a third of Mini's floor.

The aspect ratio did not hold

We requested 16:9 on WAN 2.1 Video. The file we downloaded measured 640 by 640, square like our source photo, not widescreen. In image-to-video mode it appears to inherit the source image's shape rather than honor the aspect_ratio field.

Why Choose Pixel Dojo for Seedance 2 Mini vs WAN 2.1 Video

Professional-quality results with cutting-edge AI technology

WAN 2.1 Video has the lower price floor

1.5 credits for a 1 second clip, because duration can go as low as 1 second and the per-second rate itself is the only cost driver.

Seedance 2 Mini keeps the frame you ask for

Our 480p run came back at 864 by 496, matching the widescreen shape we requested, at 24fps over the full 5 seconds.

Only one of the two ships audio

Seedance 2 Mini generates a synchronized audio track by default at no added cost. WAN 2.1 Video has no audio field in its schema at all.

How It Works

How we ran the comparison, so you can repeat it:

1

Start from one product photo

We used the same earbuds still as the starting frame for both models, so any difference in the output traces back to the model, not the input.

2

Run each model at its own cheapest floor

Seedance 2 Mini's floor is a 5 second clip at 480p. WAN 2.1 Video's floor is a 1 second clip, since duration goes as low as 1 and resolution does not change the price.

3

Send the same orbit instruction and compare the files

One camera-orbit prompt, one call per apiId. We downloaded both results and checked the real dimensions, frame rate, and whether an audio stream was present, not just what each model's settings claimed.

Turn your own photo into a video

The Pixel Dojo Advantage

One product still, one orbit instruction, run through both models at each one's cheapest allowed duration on the same day.

OthersPixel Dojo
WAN 2.1 Video: 1.5 credits per second at any resolution, 1.5 credits for our 1 second clip, about 224 seconds to renderSeedance 2 Mini: 1 credit per second at 480p, 5 credits for our 5 second clip, about 248 seconds to render
WAN 2.1 Video: we asked for 16:9, the file measured 640 by 640 at 16fps, square like the source photoSeedance 2 Mini: delivered 864 by 496 at 24fps, matching the requested 480p widescreen framing
WAN 2.1 Video: no audio track, but accepts a LoRA URL and strength for a custom style on top of the same text-and-image contractSeedance 2 Mini: generates synchronized audio by default at no added cost, and shares its API contract with the Fast and High tiers

Loved by creators on PixelDojo

Real feedback from people using PixelDojo, pulled from our in-product surveys.

it is an amazing site to create a pics and vids for those who don't have the hardware themselves
Verified PixelDojo creator
good tools in one place
Verified PixelDojo creator
Prompt updates, strong features, and a community that is always willing to help and hear/act on professional feedback. I've never had a better experience.
Verified PixelDojo creator
user friendly all in one thing
Verified PixelDojo creator
I really like the schedule of AI work performed!
Verified PixelDojo creator
The best tools for IA on the web !
Verified PixelDojo creator

Common Questions

Everything you need to know about Seedance 2 Mini vs WAN 2.1 Video

Which is cheaper, Seedance 2 Mini or WAN 2.1 Video?

WAN 2.1 Video has the lower price floor because its duration can go as low as 1 second, at 1.5 credits per second regardless of resolution. Our 1 second test clip cost 1.5 credits. Seedance 2 Mini's shortest duration option is 5 seconds, so its cheapest possible run is 5 credits at 480p.

Which one is faster to render?

WAN 2.1 Video finished in about 224 seconds against about 248 seconds for Seedance 2 Mini in our test, though Mini's clip was five times longer, 5 seconds against 1.

Do both generate audio?

No. Seedance 2 Mini generates a synchronized audio track by default with no separate toggle or surcharge. WAN 2.1 Video's schema has no audio field, and the file we downloaded carried no audio stream.

Do they respect the aspect ratio you request?

Seedance 2 Mini did in our test, returning 864 by 496 for a 480p widescreen request. WAN 2.1 Video did not: we requested 16:9 and the returned file measured 640 by 640, matching the square shape of our source photo instead.

Which one should I use for a short product clip?

Pick WAN 2.1 Video when you want the lowest possible price on a very short test clip, don't need audio, and can accept the output taking on your source image's aspect ratio. Pick Seedance 2 Mini when you need a full 5 second or longer clip that keeps your requested framing, plus audio, for close to the same per-second rate at 480p.

How do I call them from the API?

POST to /api/v1/models/seedance-2-mini/run or /api/v1/models/wan-2.1-video/run with the same API key, an image_url, and a prompt.

Or run it on WAN 2.1 Video

Ready to Create Amazing Seedance 2 Mini vs WAN 2.1 Video Images?

Join thousands of creators using AI to bring their ideas to life