WAN Reference to Video
Generated on PixelDojo with WAN Reference to Video. Produced by PixelDojo's generation pipeline.
WAN Reference to Video prices by the second and by which of its three model variants you pick: 1.75 credits a second for WAN 2.6 Flash at 720p and 2.25 at 1080p, 3 for WAN 2.7 or WAN 2.6 at 720p and 4.5 at 1080p. We ran the cheapest realistic combination, the WAN 2.7 variant at 720p for 2 seconds with a single reference image, and on August 26, 2026 it charged 4 credits at the rate then (6 at today's rate) and returned in about 261 seconds. This page lays out the full rate table, what a reference-driven request needs, and where it beats a plain image-to-video tool.
The 4 credit clip we timed
Every example below was produced on PixelDojo. Hover to see the prompt.
Slow cinematic camera orbit around the earbuds case, soft studio lighting shifts, the lid opens gently to reveal the earbuds, product commercial style
WAN Reference to Video
Three model variants, three prices
WAN 2.7: 3 credits a second at 720p, 4.5 at 1080p
The default variant and the best character consistency of the three, per the tool's own variant descriptions. Our test used this one.
WAN 2.6: same rate as WAN 2.7
A prior generation model at an identical 3 or 4.5 credit per second rate, kept available for single and multi character videos.
WAN 2.6 Flash: 1.75 credits a second at 720p, 2.25 at 1080p
Cheaper than the other two, described as built for quick previews and drafts rather than a finished shot.
Up to 5 references, image or video
One field, reference_urls, accepts either kind. We sent a single product still, but the same request could carry up to five references at once.
Multi-shot composition
shot_type can be set to multi for a composed sequence across references, which keeps the model's own prompt rewriting on since multi-shot depends on it.
What our clip measured
1280 by 720 pixels, 30 frames a second, exactly 2.00 seconds long, about 0.62 megabytes. We judged it by these render facts rather than by grading the footage.
Three variants, 1.75 to 4.5 credits a second. Our WAN 2.7 test at 720p for 2 seconds: 4 credits at the August rate, about 261 seconds.
Why Choose Pixel Dojo for WAN Reference to Video
Professional-quality results with cutting-edge AI technology
1.75 to 4.5 credits a second, your choice of variant
WAN 2.6 Flash costs less per second than WAN 2.7 or WAN 2.6 when a draft pass is all you need.
4 credits for our cheapest run, measured
WAN 2.7, 720p, 2 seconds, one reference image. Timed on August 26, 2026 from request to finished file.
Up to 5 references in one request
Image or video references, mixed freely in the same reference_urls list, feeding a single generation. Each second of a reference video is billed at the same rate as a second of output, since the reference footage is processed too.
How It Works
How we ran the 4 credit clip:
Pick a variant for the rate you want
We used WAN 2.7, then 2 credits a second and 3 today. WAN 2.6 Flash, at 1.75, is the cheaper variant.
Send one reference image, or up to five
We passed a single product still through reference_urls. The same field accepts up to five image or video references.
Generate in the app or over the API
From the tool page, or POST to /api/v1/models/wan-reference-to-video/run. Ours charged 4 credits and returned in about 261 seconds.
Loved by creators on PixelDojo
Real feedback from people using PixelDojo, pulled from our in-product surveys.
the number of options, and especially the quick response to questions on Discord
Love you guys!!
Trained my Lora super fast. Still working out how to creat content wit it, but I love it so far.
I love this app
It has all the tools I can think of...
deployment rate of splendid features is incredible. Legend
Explore more AI tools on PixelDojo
Popular AI Models
AI Tools
Compare & Switch
- Best AI Image Generators
- Best AI Video Generators
- Midjourney Alternatives
- Civitai Alternatives
- Runway Alternatives
- Leonardo Alternatives
- Pika Alternatives
- Luma Alternatives
- Magnific Alternatives
- Veo Alternatives
- Flux Alternatives
- Freepik Alternatives
- Seedance Alternatives
- Seedream Alternatives
- Pixverse Alternatives
- GPT Image Alternatives
- Synthesia Alternatives
- Playground Alternatives
- NightCafe Alternatives
- Canva AI Alternatives
- ElevenLabs Alternatives
- ComfyUI Alternatives
- Fal Alternatives
- Replicate Alternatives
Common Questions
Everything you need to know about WAN Reference to Video
How much does WAN Reference to Video cost?
How fast is it?
Our August 26, 2026 test, WAN 2.7 at 720p for 2 seconds, took about 261 seconds from request to finished file, run inside a batch alongside four other model tests.
How many reference images can I use?
Up to 5, mixing image and video references in the same request through the reference_urls field. Image references add nothing to the price; each second of a reference video is billed at the output rate, so a 6 second clip as a reference adds 18 credits at 720p on WAN 2.7. We used one image.
What is multi-shot mode?
Setting shot_type to multi asks the model to compose a sequence across your references rather than a single continuous shot. It keeps prompt rewriting on, since the tool's own logic notes multi-shot depends on it.
How is this different from WAN 2.1 Video or WAN 2.2 Plus?
WAN 2.1 Video and WAN 2.2 Plus animate a single starting image at a per-second or flat fee. WAN Reference to Video takes up to 5 references at once and can compose a multi-shot sequence from them, which neither sibling supports.
How do I call it from the API?
POST to /api/v1/models/wan-reference-to-video/run with your API key, a prompt, and reference_urls. Same key and request shape as every other model in the catalog.